Joint Order Allowing Reports Of Ought Not To Pass To Be Made After The Committee Vote

Introduced

In Committee

Floor

Crossed Over

Passed

Enacted

Overview Bill text 1 History 10 Sponsors

Mar 4, 2025 · Senate

Taken from the table by the President

Mar 4, 2025 · Senate

Motion by Senator STEWART of Aroostook REFERENCE to the Committee on JOINT RULES In NON-CONCURRENCE FAILED

Mar 4, 2025 · Senate

Roll Call Ordered Roll Call Number 32 Yeas 15 - Nays 20 - Excused 0 - Absent 0

Mar 4, 2025 · Senate

Subsequently PASSED 2/3 Vote Required in concurrence

Feb 25, 2025 · Senate

READ

Feb 25, 2025 · Senate

On motion by Senator PIERCE of Cumberland Tabled until Later in Today's Session, pending Motion by Senator STEWART of Aroostook to REFER to the Committee on JOINT RULES In NON-CONCURRENCE

Feb 11, 2025 · House

READ.

Feb 11, 2025 · House

Pursuant to Joint Rule 102, this Joint Order required the affirmative vote of two-thirds of those present for PASSAGE.

Feb 11, 2025 · House

138 having voted in the affirmative and 0 in the negative, 138 being more than two-thirds of the membership present, the Joint Order was PASSED.

Feb 11, 2025 · House

Sent for concurrence. ORDERED SENT FORTHWITH.

PASSAGE PROBABILITY

2.8% Unlikely

Why this number

Stage base In Committee — base rate 29%, measured from ME's completed sessions
Momentum -4 31/100 from the pace of recorded action
Time since last action -22 585 days quiet

A transparent scoring model over stage, momentum, recency, sponsorship and recorded votes — not a trained predictor. Treat it as a way to rank attention, not as a forecast.